From:
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:04
AM
To:
Subject: Fwd: Clean Water Restoration Act of 2007,
aka H.R. 2421, not about clean water
-----Original
Message-----
From:
Sent: 8/27/2007 6:00:24 P.M. Pacific
Daylight Time
Subject: H.R. 2421 not about "clean water:"
(sportsmen/recreati
Clean
Water Restoration Act of 2007, aka
H.R.
2421, not
about clean water
August 27, 2007
By Julie Kay Smithson propertyrights@
It is critical that people from
all walks of life get involved by calling 202-224-3121 and tell the staffers for
their U.S. reps. and senators that this bill must go down in the
flames it so richly deserves.
H.R. 2421, the "Clean Water
Restoration Act of 2007," is due to be marked up for a vote in the U.S. House
sometime in September or October. Please keep this bill analysis handy and call
-- and continue to call -- your elected officials to explain why "it's not about
'clean water.'"
H.R. 2421 is not about "clean
water;" it is about restricting the use of all land (this includes private
property) by redefining "waters of the United States" to expand the federal
scope of regulation and control. H.R. 2421 (and its companion bill, S.1870)
redefine "waters of the United States" from "navigable" to this nightmare: "...
all waters subject to the ebb and flow
of the tide, the territorial seas, and all interstate and intrastate waters and
their tributaries, including lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent
streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows,
playa lakes, natural ponds, and all impoundments of the foregoing, to the
fullest extent that these waters, or activities affecting these waters, are
subject to the legislative power of Congress..." and even has the gall to further state: "...under the
Constitution." This is out of control legislation, something the Founding
Fathers and the Constitution of the United States of America never intended --
but the "green groups" and their "green elected officials" want you to think
it's the neatest thing since sliced bread. Even some sportsmen and sportsmen's
groups have been tricked into thinking this will benefit them and their
interests. Wrong! It will be too late if this bill is allowed to remain below
the radar of most Americans whose property rights will be violated by its
tentacles. Take action now and send this one to the shedder, directly to the
shredder, without passing go or collecting any funding! The number to call is
202-224-3121. Call now, call tomorrow and call often until the bill is dead.
This bill has been read, reread,
analyzed and scrutinized by many astute minds and the red flags are flying
-- H.R. 2421 (and its Senate version, which is S. 1870) is not what its
supporters would like you to think. It jerks another stick in the bundle of
property rights from property owners. The Clean Water Act does not need to be
"transformed" into such a behemoth, one that would exert onerous restrictions
over all wet places.
Feingold introduced it in the
Senate as S.1870 on July 25. It is in the Environment and Public Works
Committee.
Oberstar introduced it in the
House as HR 2421 on May 22. It is in the Transportation and Infrastructure
Committee's Subcommittee on Water, Resources and Environment.
Three hundred "green" groups
(green as in the color of money, not actually benefiting "the environment")
support this. Please read its text below and see that they smell money if it is
passed.
Markup on this monster can come in
September or October.
It is critical that people from
all walks of life get involved by calling 202-224-3121 and tell the staffers for
their U.S. reps. and senators that this bill must go down in the
flames it so richly deserves.
Clean Water Restoration
Act of 2007 (Introduced in House)
HR 2421 IH
110th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2421
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify the
jurisdiction of the United States over waters of the United
States.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Mr. OBERSTAR (for himself, Mr. DINGELL, Mr.
EHLERS, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. PLATTS,
Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. COHEN, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. KIRK, Mr.
NADLER, Mr. WALSH of New York, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. CASTLE, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. SMITH
of New Jersey, Mr. FILNER, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. CAPUANO, Ms.
HIRONO, Mr. KAGEN, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. CUMMINGS, Ms. CARSON, Mr.
MCNERNEY, Mr. ARCURI, Mr. CARNAHAN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. HALL of New York, Mr.
DOGGETT, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. BRADY of
Pennsylvania, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. SCHWARTZ, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. THOMPSON of
California, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Ms. MCCOLLUM of
Minnesota, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. BERMAN, Mr.
KILDEE, Ms. HOOLEY, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. WAXMAN, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. MORAN of Virginia,
Mr. SARBANES, Mr. PATRICK J. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts,
Mr. DOYLE, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. OLVER, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. HONDA, Mr.
ABERCROMBIE, Mr. CHANDLER, Mr. CROWLEY, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr.
MOORE of Kansas, Ms. CASTOR, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. SPRATT,
Mr. CLAY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. WYNN, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. VISCLOSKY,
Ms. WOOLSEY, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. SIRES, Mr. HODES, Mr. STARK, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr.
DELAHUNT, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. MURPHY of Connecticut, Mr.
KANJORSKI, Mr. ROTHMAN, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Ms. SUTTON, Ms.
SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. HOLT, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr.
FARR, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. ALLEN, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms.
JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. GORDON of Tennessee, Ms. BEAN,
Ms. SOLIS, Mr. KLEIN of Florida, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Ms. LORETTA
SANCHEZ of California, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. WU, Mr.
TIERNEY, Mr. WEINER, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Ms. CLARKE,
Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. MARKEY, Mr.
MEEHAN, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. DAVIS of Alabama, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mrs.
MCCARTHY of New York, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. DICKS, Mr. KIND, Mr. LARSON of
Connecticut, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. WELCH of Vermont, Mr.
GUTIERREZ, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. COOPER, Mr. RUSH, Mr. CONYERS, Mr.
STUPAK, Ms. LINDA T. SANCHEZ of California, Ms. WATERS, Ms. HARMAN, Mr.
BUTTERFIELD, Mr. YARMUTH, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. INSLEE, Ms.
LEE, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. DELAURO, and Mr. LYNCH) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure
A BILL
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
to clarify the jurisdiction of the United States over waters of the United
States.
Be it enacted by the Senate
and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress
assembled,
This Act may be cited as the
`Clean Water Restoration Act of 2007'.
The purposes of this Act are as
follows:
(1) To reaffirm the original
intent of Congress in enacting the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
Amendments of 1972 (86 Stat. 816) to restore and maintain the chemical,
physical, and biological integrity of the waters of the United
States.
(2) To clearly define the waters
of the United States that are subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
(33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.).
(3) To provide protection to the
waters of the United States to the fullest extent of the legislative authority
of Congress under the Constitution.
Congress finds the
following:
(1) Water is a unique and precious
resource that is necessary to sustain human life and the life of animals and
plants.
(2) Water is used not only for
human, animal, and plant consumption, but is also important for agriculture,
transportation, flood control, energy production, recreation, fishing and
shellfishing, and municipal and commercial uses.
(3) In enacting amendments to the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act in 1972 and through subsequent amendment,
including the Clean Water Act of 1977 (91 Stat. 1566) and the Water Quality Act
of 1987 (101 Stat. 7), Congress established the national objective of restoring
and maintaining the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the waters
of the United States and recognized that achieving this objective requires
uniform, minimum national water quality and aquatic ecosystem protection
standards to restore and maintain the natural structures and functions of the
aquatic ecosystems of the United States. Since the 1970s, the definition of
`waters of the United States' in the regulations of the Environmental Protection
Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers have properly established the scope of
waters to be protected under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C.
1251 et seq.) in order to meet such national objective.
(4) Water is transported through
interconnected hydrologic cycles, and the pollution, impairment, or destruction
of any part of an aquatic system may affect the chemical, physical, and
biological integrity of other parts of the aquatic system.
(5) Protection of intrastate
waters, along with other waters of the United States, is necessary to restore
and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of all waters in
the United States.
(6) The regulation of discharges
of pollutants into interstate and intrastate waters is an integral part of the
comprehensive clean water regulatory program of the United States.
(7) Small and intermittent
streams, including ephemeral, and seasonal streams, and their start reaches
comprise the majority of all stream and river miles in the conterminous United
States. These waters reduce the introduction of pollutants to larger rivers and
streams, affect the life cycles of aquatic organisms and wildlife, and impact
the flow of higher order streams during floods.
(8) The pollution or other
degradation of waters of the United States, individually and in the aggregate,
has a substantial relation to and effect on interstate commerce.
(9) Protection of the waters of the United States, including
intrastate waters, is necessary to prevent significant harm to interstate
commerce and sustain a robust system of interstate commerce in the
future.
(10) Waters, including wetlands,
provide protection from flooding, and draining or filling wetlands and
channelizing or filling streams, including intrastate wetlands and streams,
can cause or exacerbate flooding,
placing a significant burden on interstate commerce.
(11) Millions of people in the
United States depend on wetlands and other waters of the United States to filter
water and recharge surface and subsurface drinking water supplies, protect human
health, and create economic opportunity. Source water protection areas
containing one or more small or intermittent streams provide water to public
drinking water supplies serving more than 110,000,000 Americans.
(12) Millions of people in the United States enjoy recreational
activities that depend on intrastate waters, such as waterfowl hunting, bird watching, fishing, and
photography, and those activities and associated travel generate billions of
dollars of income each year for the travel, tourism, recreation, and sporting
sectors of the economy of the United States.
(13) Activities that result in the discharge of pollutants into
waters of the United States are commercial or economic in nature. More than 40
percent, or 14,800, facilities with permits issued under the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, including industrial facilities and municipal sewage
treatment systems, discharge into small or intermittent
streams.
(14) States have the
responsibility and right to prevent, reduce, and eliminate pollution of waters,
and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act respects the rights and
responsibilities of States by preserving for States the ability to manage
permitting, grant, and research programs to prevent, reduce, and eliminate
pollution, and to establish standards and programs more protective of a State's
waters than is provided under Federal standards and programs.
(15) Protecting the quality of
and regulating
activities affecting the waters of
the United States is a necessary and
proper means of implementing treaties to which the United States is a party,
including treaties protecting species of fish, birds, and
wildlife.
(16) Protecting the quality of
and regulating
activities affecting the waters of
the United States is a necessary and
proper means of protecting Federal land, including hundreds of millions of acres
of parkland, refuge land, and other land under Federal ownership and the wide
array of waters encompassed by that land.
(17) Protecting the quality of and
regulating activities
affecting the waters of the United
States is necessary to protect Federal
land and waters from discharges of pollutants and other forms of
degradation.
Section 502 of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1362) is amended--
(1) by striking paragraph
(7);
(2) by redesignating paragraphs
(8) through (24) as paragraphs (7) through (23), respectively; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
`(24) WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES-
The term `waters of the United States' means all waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, the
territorial seas, and all interstate and intrastate waters and their
tributaries, including lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams),
mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa
lakes, natural ponds, and all impoundments of the foregoing, to the fullest
extent that these waters, or activities affecting these waters, are subject to
the legislative power of Congress under the
Constitution.
The Federal Water Pollution
Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) is amended--
(1) by striking `navigable waters of the United States' each place
it appears and inserting `waters of the United States';
(2) in section 304(l)(1) by striking `NAVIGABLE WATERS' in the
heading and inserting `WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES'; and
(3) by striking `navigable waters' each place it appears and
inserting `waters of the United States'.
Nothing in this Act (including any
amendment made by this Act) shall be construed as affecting the authority of the
Secretary of the Army or the Administrator of the Environmental Protection
Agency (as the case may be) under the following provisions of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.):
(1) Section 402(l)(1), relating to
discharges composed entirely of agricultural return flows.
(2) Section 402(l)(2), relating to
discharges of stormwater runoff from oil, gas, and mining
operations.
(3) Section 404(f)(1)(A)
(4) Section 404(f)(1)(B)
(5) Section 404(f)(1)(C)
(6) Section 404(f)(1)(D)
(7) Section 404(f)(1)(E)
(8) Section 404(f)(1)(F)